<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calvinism is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/</link>
	<description>Starting from sea level, gaining a little elevation each day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua</title>
		<link>http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

I don&#039;t exactly get your point, can you be more explicit?  Are you simply arguing that human authority based on apostolic succession is the only true source of doctrine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t exactly get your point, can you be more explicit?  Are you simply arguing that human authority based on apostolic succession is the only true source of doctrine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Your Personal Opinion May Have No Bearing 
Whatsoever On Doctrinal Truth&lt;/b&gt;...

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Teacher, we know that you are a truthful man and that you are not concerned with anyone�s opinion. You do not regard a person�s status but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth.&quot; &lt;/i&gt; (Mark 12:14 (NAB)

&lt;i&gt;&quot;They sent their disciples to him, with the Herodians, saying, &quot;Teacher, we know that you are a truthful man and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. And you are not concerned with anyone�s opinion, for you do not regard a person�s status.&quot;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
(Matthew 22:16)

&lt;I&gt;&quot;They posed this question to him, &quot;Teacher, we know that what you say and teach is correct, and you show no partiality, but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth.&quot;&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (Luke 20:21)

&lt;b&gt;Jesus did not &lt;b&gt;accept the opinions of men,&lt;/b&gt; as shown in Matthew 16:13-17&lt;/b&gt;:
When Jesus went into the region of Caesarea Philippi he asked his disciples, 
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Who do people say that the Son of Man is?&quot; &lt;i&gt;
They replied, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Some say John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;
He said to them, &lt;i&gt;&quot;But who do you say that I am?&quot; &lt;/i&gt;
Simon Peter said in reply, &lt;i&gt;&quot;You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; 

Jesus said to him in reply,&lt;i&gt; &quot;Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; 

See? His disciples mostly expressed &lt;b&gt;personal opinions,&lt;/b&gt; which meant little to Jesus.
The one exception was Simon Peter, the only one who answered with authorative doctrinal truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Your Personal Opinion May Have No Bearing<br />
Whatsoever On Doctrinal Truth</b>&#8230;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Teacher, we know that you are a truthful man and that you are not concerned with anyone�s opinion. You do not regard a person�s status but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth.&#8221; </i> (Mark 12:14 (NAB)</p>
<p><i>&#8220;They sent their disciples to him, with the Herodians, saying, &#8220;Teacher, we know that you are a truthful man and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. And you are not concerned with anyone�s opinion, for you do not regard a person�s status.&#8221;"</i><br />
(Matthew 22:16)</p>
<p><i>&#8220;They posed this question to him, &#8220;Teacher, we know that what you say and teach is correct, and you show no partiality, but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth.&#8221;"</i> (Luke 20:21)</p>
<p><b>Jesus did not </b><b>accept the opinions of men,</b> as shown in Matthew 16:13-17:<br />
When Jesus went into the region of Caesarea Philippi he asked his disciples,<br />
<i>&#8220;Who do people say that the Son of Man is?&#8221; </i><i><br />
They replied, </i><i>&#8220;Some say John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.&#8221; </i><br />
He said to them, <i>&#8220;But who do you say that I am?&#8221; </i><br />
Simon Peter said in reply, <i>&#8220;You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.</i>&#8221; </p>
<p>Jesus said to him in reply,<i> &#8220;Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father.</i>&#8221; </p>
<p>See? His disciples mostly expressed <b>personal opinions,</b> which meant little to Jesus.<br />
The one exception was Simon Peter, the only one who answered with authorative doctrinal truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua</title>
		<link>http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Jason.  I am a bit embarrassed to say that I had never heard of Piper before.  My brother sent me a copy of &quot;Don&#039;t Waste Your Life&quot;, and I am almost finished, though.  I am extremely impressed with Piper and his message, and I am finding that he has a ton of useful insights about discipleship, love, and so on.  I tend to agree completely with what I have read so far from preachers like Jonathan Edwards, Spurgeon, Piper, and Bonheoffer.  So I suppose that means I am leaning Calvinist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Jason.  I am a bit embarrassed to say that I had never heard of Piper before.  My brother sent me a copy of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Waste Your Life&#8221;, and I am almost finished, though.  I am extremely impressed with Piper and his message, and I am finding that he has a ton of useful insights about discipleship, love, and so on.  I tend to agree completely with what I have read so far from preachers like Jonathan Edwards, Spurgeon, Piper, and Bonheoffer.  So I suppose that means I am leaning Calvinist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Chamberlain</title>
		<link>http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chamberlain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowerwisdom.com/2009/05/calvinism-is/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I call myself &quot;a Calvinist&quot; as sort of a shorthand of what my theology is like.  I read a lot of John Piper and I think that his view of God is right and it naturally leads one toward what is called &quot;Calvinism.&quot;  However, a lot of smart people differ on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call myself &#8220;a Calvinist&#8221; as sort of a shorthand of what my theology is like.  I read a lot of John Piper and I think that his view of God is right and it naturally leads one toward what is called &#8220;Calvinism.&#8221;  However, a lot of smart people differ on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
